<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Queen Anne Boleyn &#187; Charles Brandon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anne-boleyn.com/eng/tag/charles-brandon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anne-boleyn.com/eng</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2015 19:38:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Affair of the necklace</title>
		<link>http://www.anne-boleyn.com/eng/affair-of-the-necklace/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anne-boleyn.com/eng/affair-of-the-necklace/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 20:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sylwia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[6 wives of Henry VIII]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anne Boleyn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anne Boleyn's appearance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portraits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tudor Portraits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anne Boleyn B Necklace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Brandon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mary Rose Tudor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tudor portraits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anne-boleyn.com/eng/?p=62</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks to my friend, Maria who runs her own blog about Anne Boleyn, she shared with me an article that states that the &#8216;B&#8217; necklace on Anne&#8217;s portraits stands for &#8216;Brandon&#8217; and not &#8216;Boleyn&#8217;. Quite an interesting theory, isn&#8217;t it? I&#8217;ve decided to research this theory and I found few informations. In her book &#8221;The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_1841" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 308px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1841" title="Miniature of Anne Boleyn by John Hoskins" src="http://www.anne-boleyn.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/AnneBoleyn56-298x300.jpg" alt="" width="298" height="300" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Miniature of Anne Boleyn by John Hoskins</p></div></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Thanks to my friend, Maria who runs her own blog about Anne Boleyn, she shared with me an article that states that the &#8216;B&#8217; necklace on Anne&#8217;s portraits stands for &#8216;Brandon&#8217; and not &#8216;Boleyn&#8217;. Quite an interesting theory, isn&#8217;t it? I&#8217;ve decided to research this theory and I found few informations.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>In her book <em>&#8221;The Feminine Dynamic in English Art, 1485-1603&#8221;</em></strong>  Susan James states that famous portrait of Anne Boleyn showing her with &#8216;B&#8217; pendant is Mary Tudor Brandon.  Susan James writes ,;</p>
<p><span id="more-62"></span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><em>&#8220;Although there were no firmly authenticated portraits of Jane Grey or Anne Boleyn known to copyists, a pool of portraits of unidentified women dating from the reign of Henry VIII still existed. As was common, these original paintings were not labelled and &#8230; the identities of the sitters were generally problematic. Yet for copyists in need of an image, clues within and without seem to have encouraged them to arrive at speculative identifications. <strong>The face pattern generally chosen for Jane Grey was Kateryn Parr and the face pattern chosen for Anne Boleyn was Mary Rose Tudor&#8230;&#8221;</strong></em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.anne-boleyn.com/?page_id=1685"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1856 aligncenter" title="Necklace" src="http://www.anne-boleyn.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/banner11-300x38.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="38" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>What do we know about Mary Tudor Brandon&#8217;s appearance?</strong> Is there a chance she could be confused with Anne Boleyn? Well – if we will take only contemporary descriptions of both Anne and Mary, there is no chance that they were similar to each other. Mary Tudor Brandon was :</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><em>&#8221;Petite, poised and beautiful, <strong>with red-gold hair</strong> and <strong>the pale translucent complexion</strong> that usually accompanies it. She was the ideal picture of womanhood, certainly and the quintessence of Tudor beauty&#8221;.</em> / Mary Boleyn: The True Story of Henry VIII&#8217;s Favourite Mistress /</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">According to contemporary sources, Anne Boleyn was quite the opposite ;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><em>‘Madame Anne is not the handsomest women in the world , she is of middling statue, <strong>swarthy complexion</strong>, <strong>long neck, wide mouth, bosom not much raised</strong>, and (&#8230;) her eyes, which are black and beautiful’ /Venetian ambassador, 1532/</em></p>
<p><div id="attachment_1845" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 209px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1845" title="MaryTudorQueenFrance" src="http://www.anne-boleyn.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/MaryTudorQueenFrance-199x300.jpg" alt="" width="199" height="300" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Sketch of Mary Tudor when she was Queen of France</p></div></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">She was also reffered by poet Sir Thomas Wyatt as a <strong>&#8216;Brunette&#8217;.</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Susan James states that well known miniature by John Hoskins depicting Anne Boleyn is in fact, Mary Tudor Brandon and  &#8221;<em>jewelled &#8220;B&#8221; stood not for Boleyn but for Brandon and tha the portrait was not Henry VIII&#8217;s wife but his sister&#8221;. </em>Susan James points out that <em>&#8221; It is the only picture in Charles I&#8217;s collection with Anne Boleyn&#8217;s name attached to it.&#8221; </em></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">In his book<strong><em> &#8216;The Life and Death of Anne Boleyn&#8217;</em></strong> Eric Ives writes about Hoskins&#8217; miniature ;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><em>&#8221;Fortunately, the sequence also has the effect of corroborating a seventeenth-century miniature in thecollection of the Duke of Buccleuch and Queensberry. <strong>Charles I had this copied as ‘Anne Boleyn’</strong> by <strong>John Hoskins the elder</strong> (c.1590–1664/5), <strong>and it is endorsed ‘from an ancient original’</strong> . How ‘ancient’ it is impossible to say. Although the relationship to examples in the NPG pattern is evident, these were only thirty years old or perhaps less. <strong>It is more likely that Hoskins had access to an earlier image of the kind from which the NPG image originated.</strong> <strong>A full-length portrait of Anne was owned by Lord Lumley in 1590 and existed as late as 1773. Could it even be that Hoskins’ source was or was derived from a Holbein paintingnow lost?</strong>&#8221; /Eric Ives , ‘The Life and Death of Anne Boleyn’ /</em></p>
<p><div id="attachment_1843" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1843" title="ab" src="http://www.anne-boleyn.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/abr-300x249.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="249" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Mary Tudor Brandon (left) and Anne Boleyn (right)</p></div></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Hoskins&#8217; miniature of Anne Boleyn depicts a woman with pointed chin, dark eyes, oval face, reddish hair and typical &#8216;B&#8217; pendant on double strand of pearls. She may bear a <strong>certain resemblance to wedding portrait of Mary Tudor Brandon and Charles Brandon.</strong></p>
<p><strong>I think that there is no chance that &#8216;B&#8217; on Anne&#8217;s portraits stands for &#8216;Brandon&#8217; and not &#8216;Boleyn&#8217;. Here are the arguments : </strong></p>
<p>-          Hoskins&#8217; miniature was said to be  <strong><em>&#8216;don by Hoskins after an oweld pictur&#8217;</em> </strong>which means that this <strong>miniature was labelled as &#8216;Anne Boleyn&#8217; from the very beggining</strong> ;</p>
<p>-          As professor Eric Ives pointed out, <strong>the miniature was endorsed <em>&#8216;from an ancient original&#8217;</em></strong> which means that it was probably copied from exisiting orginal portrait of Anne Boleyn, or copy of such portrait ;</p>
<p>-          There is <strong>plenty of portraits of Anne Boleyn, painted during Elizabeth Tudor&#8217;s reign, depicting Anne wearing a famous &#8216;B&#8217; necklace </strong>; and they are all labelled as &#8216;Anne Boleyn&#8217;  and not &#8216;Mary Tudor Brandon&#8217;</p>
<p>-          Mary Tudor Brandon <strong>had no reason to wear a &#8216;B&#8217; pendant</strong> because in Tudor period noble men and women were known widely not by their surnames but titles ; so Charles Brandon was famous as Charles Suffolk, Duke of Suffolk, so it makes no sense why Mary Tudor Brandon would want to be portrayed with &#8216;B&#8217; pendant ;</p>
<p>-          <strong>The similarity between portraits of Anne Boleyn and her daughter Elizabeth</strong> are astounding so it is hard to believe that the sitters is not Anne Boleyn ;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Sources :</p>
<p><em>&#8221;The Feminine Dynamic in English Art, 1485-1603&#8221;, Susan James</em></p>
<p><em>&#8220;The Life and Death of Anne Boleyn&#8221;, Eric Ives</em></p>
<p><em> &#8221;Mary Boleyn: The True Story of Henry VIII&#8217;s Favourite Mistress &#8220;, Josephine Wilkinson</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anne-boleyn.com/eng/affair-of-the-necklace/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
